Menu | Rating System | Guest Book | Archived Reviews:
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

         
       
         
 
Recording:
  Reactionary  
 
Artist:
  Face To Face  
 
Label:
  Lady Luck  
 
Release Date:
  6.June.2000  
 
Reviewed by:
  PostLibyan  
         
 
Rating:
   
         
 
Review:
 

I enjoy Face To Face. I think that they have some great punk anthems (like Walk The Walk or Ordinary). I think that they are one of the best So Cal punk bands. I have enjoyed their albums -- even the last one which seemed more new wave than punk.

I looked forward to the release of this album. Not only is it 12 new songs, but it's 12 new songs that the fans selected as the best from the batch of MP3's that Face To Face put up on their website in March. It was a neat idea -- dump all of the new stuff up there and let the fans decide what's the best of the batch.

Well, it seems that the theory was better than the application. The 12 songs featured here are the least edgy and most generic of the bunch. The fans voted for Face To Face to take no challenges, to do nothing new and instead try and re-write their earlier work.

That's fine. I can see how sometimes you don't want a band to change. However, what bothers me is that Face To Face were willing to play along.

Oh sure, it's what the fans wanted. Now. Will this album be remembered in three year's time, or will those same fans have moved on to the latest thing with that "sound"?

The end result is that this album sounds kind of generic. Crunchy guitars. Thundering drums. Vocals sometimes sung, sometimes yelled. It's the "punk formula" done over and over.

But there doesn't seem to be any soul in it! When Face To Face wailed out Ordinary, they were singing about their own experiences with isolation and loneliness. Their anger was sincere.

I sense no sincerity in this album. They are simply following the formula.

It's all the more disappointing because the studio album before this one, Ignorance Is Bliss, took a lot of risks. Trevor Keith sang a lot and yelled less. They played with melodies that lie firmly outside the realm of punk. There was a string section on a couple of songs fer chrissakes! They were taking risks....

Apparently, not everyone liked that album. I did, but i think that the reaction from their fan base (which is not entirely made up of jaded and bitter thirty year old music geeks but instead consists mostly of teenage boys who are also into "extreme sports") was largely negative. Perhaps this album is a direct result of that. Face To Face got scared of losing their fans, so this time around they let the fans have total power.

Whatever.

Another comment, and this is true of almost all of their recorded body of work -- Face To Face have never figured out how to record themselves. On this album the guitars sound really really slick. Trevor Keith's voice is waaaay up front. I would like a little more fuzz and distortion on those guitars, and for Trevor to be buried a little in the mix. (I guess what i really want is for Steve Albini to produce them, but oh well.)

I was quite disappointed with this album. Oh, it's not bad, but i know that they are capable of so much more! It seems like they took a big step backwards, musically.

My advice to you -- go track down a copy of their Live album from 1998. That's some good, sincere, punk rock!

 
         
 
Related Links:
  Face To Face's very own website.  
         

Return to the top of this page. | Return to the Album Review menu.